Legal Opinion

Dooley v. Anton

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 27, 1960PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFroessel, J.

The question we are called upon to decide is

whether an injunction permanently restraining peaceful recognitional picketing by two minority unions, where the employer had recognized and contracted with a different and independent union representing a majority of his employees, may stand. It is clear that the employer’s business activities affect interstate commerce for the purpose of the jurisdiction of the National Labor Relations Act (U. S. Code, tit. 29, § 151 et seq., herein called the Act), and the lower courts necessarily assumed so in their decisions. The employer was awarded injunctive…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Brooks v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. Weber v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. Drivers, Chauffeurs, Helpers, Local Union No. 639Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. United Mine Workers of America v. Arkansas Oak Flooring Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Barclay's Ice Cream Co. v. Local No. 757 of the Ice Cream Drivers & Employees UnionNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Barclay's Ice Cream Co. v. Local No. 757 of the Ice Cream Drivers & Employees UnionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  3. Waldbaum, Inc. v. United Farm WorkersNew York Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Ex Parte GeorgeTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Ex Parte GeorgeTexas Supreme Court · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API