Legal Opinion

Orlando v. Schiavo Bros.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 29, 1973No. Appeal, No. 234 C.D. 1973PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Rogers,

Claimant, Michael Orlando, is receiving benefits pursuant to an agreement voluntarily entered into by him and his former employer, Sehiavo Brothers, Inc., reciting his disability as a result of back injuries suffered in an accident on February 28, 1967, and which was modified by a supplemental agreement reflecting his return to work at a reduced rate of pay. Orlando thereafter filed a petition to modify the agreement on the *88ground that Ms average weekly wages were understated in the original agreement because it had failed to include a bonus paid to him on June 12,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tucker v. TuckerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  2. Chubb v. Allegheny Country ClubSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  3. Widmer v. WidmerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  4. Specker v. Sun Ray Drug Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Beardsley v. State Employes' Retirement BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Lane Enterprises, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Bolnick v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Vas v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. McAdam v. United Parcel Service & Helmsman Management Services, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API