Di Napoli v. Exxon Corp.
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SAROKIN, District Judge.
Plaintiff moved for summary judgment to enjoin defendant Exxon from terminating plaintiff’s franchise, and has also moved for interim attorney’s fees. Defendant has cross-moved for summary judgment or, alternatively, for an order dissolving the preliminary injunction.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
On June 1, 1979, DiNapoli executed a retail service station lease and a sales agreement with Exxon under which DiNapoli operated an Exxon retail service station in Little Falls, New Jersey. The sales agreement specified that if the plaintiff were to cease selling Exxon’s motor…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- National State Bank of Newark v. Terminal Const. Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1963
- Ted's Tire Service Inc. v. Chevron U. S. A. Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1979
- Gilderhus v. Amoco Oil Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1979
- Swisscraft Novelty Co. v. Alad Realty Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Florham Park Chevron, Inc. v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1988
- Glenside West Corp. v. Exxon Co., USADistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1991
- The Wisser Company, Inc. v. Mobil Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Shell Oil Co. v. Anne Cara Oil Co. (In Re Anne Cara Oil Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1983
- Bankr. L. Rep. P 71,566 in Re Fred Herbert, Debtor. Atlantic Richfield Company v. Fred HerbertCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.