Legal Opinion

Morgan v. Anthony

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 2000No. 99-1018PublishedCited by 251 opinions

1Per curiam

Deborah Morgan sued Mack Anthony for intentional infliction of emotional distress. Anthony moved for summary judgment on the basis that there was no evi- denee that he acted intentionally, that his conduct was extreme or outrageous, or that Morgan suffered severe emotional distress. The trial court granted Anthony’s motion, and the court of appeals affirmed. Because we hold that there is some evidence of the three elements of Morgan’s cause of action that are at issue, we reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and remand this case to the trial court.

This Court adopted the Restatement’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Randall's Food Markets, Inc. v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Twyman v. TwymanTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Flameout Design & Fabrication, Inc. v. Pennzoil Caspian Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1999
  4. City of Midland v. O'BRYANTTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Yates v. FisherTexas Supreme Court · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by251 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Co. v. RidgwayTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Johnson v. Brewer & Pritchard, P.C.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Kroger Texas Ltd. Partnership v. SuberuTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. RodriguezTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Fort Worth Osteopathic Hospital, Inc. v. ReeseTexas Supreme Court · 2004

246 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API