Legal Opinion

Mintner v. Mintner

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 15, 2017No. WD 79754PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJames Edward Welsh, Presiding Judge

Deborah Mintner appeals the circuit court’s judgment, following a jury trial, in favor of Joseph Mintner on his claim that Deborah breached her fiduciary duty as the attorney-in-fact under the Durable Power of Attorney of their mother, Eugenia Mintner. We affirm.

Background

In June 2011, Eugenia1 executed a Du-rablé Power-of Attorney (DPOA) and her Last Will and Testameht. The DPOA named Joseph as her attorney-in-fact. A little over a year later, on July 11, 2012, Eugenia amended her DPOA to name Deborah as her attomey-in-fact. The DPOA did not contain a provision allowing the attorney-in-fact…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Care & Treatment of Kirk v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2017
  2. Bach v. Winfield-Foley Fire Protection DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008
  3. In Re the Care & Treatment of Van OrdenSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008
  4. Estate of Herbert v. HerbertMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Evelyn J. Randall, by Thomas Randall, Personal Representative of The Estate of Evelyn Randall v. Eddie D. Randall and Donald Orville RandallMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Como Premium Construction LLC, D/B/A Como Premium vs. Erin L. PulsterMissouri Court of Appeals · 2025
  2. ESTATE OF NANCY MCKEAN, BY AND THROUGH PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE CHRISTI EGLOFF v. GLORIA D. BAKER, KENNETH BAKER, and JUSTIN BLAKEMissouri Court of Appeals · 2023
  3. First Community Credit Union v. Samuel Rowley, Sheryl A. Rowley, and Archdiocese of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API