In Re the Care & Treatment of Van Orden
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM RAY PRICE, JR., Judge.
Richard Wheeler and John Van Orden previously were convicted of sexually violent offenses. Because of their previous convictions, the state filed a petition for civil commitment of Van Orden and Wheeler as sexually violent predators pursuant to section 632.480 et seq.1 The court, in the ease of Wheeler, and the jury, in the case of Van Orden, found that they met the definition of a “sexually violent predator” by clear and convincing evidence pursuant to section 632.495, and judgment was entered ordering then1 commitment.
Van Orden and Wheeler appeal them…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- DeWitt v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1984
- Jamison v. State, Department of Social Services, Division of Family ServicesSupreme Court of Missouri · 2007
- Care & Treatment of Murrell v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Care & Treatment of Kirk v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2017
- DeWalt v. Davidson Service/Air, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- Lau v. PughMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
- In re the Care & Treatment of A.B.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2011
- Brown v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.