Legal Opinion
Maddock & Miller, Inc. v. Mayer China Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 26, 1965PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEVET, District Judge.
The defendant United States Lines and other defendants have moved this court for an order to dismiss the complaint under Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure upon the ground that it appears on the face of the complaint that this court lacks jurisdiction of the subject matter.
This action allegedly is brought pursuant to Sections 1, 13,15 and 26 of Title 15 U.S.C., commonly known as the Sherman and Clayton Acts.
THE COMPLAINT
THE FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION
The first cause of action is aimed at all defendants, including United States Lines. The gist of the first cause…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Far East Conference v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Keogh v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- United States Navigation Co. v. Cunard Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- United States v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cullen v. New York State Civil Service CommissionDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1977
- Cullen v. NEW YORK STATE CIVIL SERV. COMN.District Court, E.D. New York · 1977