Legal Opinion

Jordan v. Siegelman

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 21, 2006No. 1040354PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1 Donald Siegelman, Henry Mabry, William Pryor, and Lucy Baxley no longer hold the offices they held when Jordan filed the complaint in this action. Rule 25(d)(1), Ala. R. Civ. P., provides:

"When a public officer is a party to an action in an official capacity and during its pendency dies, resigns, or otherwise ceases to hold office, the action does not abate and the officer's successor is automatically substituted as a party. Proceedings following the substitution shall be in the name of the substituted party, but any misnomer not affecting the substantial rights of the parties shall be…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Bass v. SOUTHTRUST BANK OF BALDWIN CTY.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Wilson v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  4. Blue Cross and Blue Shield v. HodurskiSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  5. Fergus v. RusselIllinois Supreme Court · 1915

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Riley v. PateSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  2. City of Brundidge v. Alabama Department of Environmental ManagementCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2016
  3. Midsouth Association of Independent Schools, Mississippi Department of Finance and Administration, David McRae, In His Official Capacity as State Treasurer, and Liz Welch, In Her Official Capacity as State Fiscal Officer v. Parents for Public SchoolsMississippi Supreme Court · 2024
  4. Riley v. PateSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API