Legal Opinion

Hodgkiss & Douma, Inc. v. Woodward Development Co.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided July 21, 1976No. Docket 25895PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtD. E. Holbrook, J.

This case deals with the interpretation of Michigan’s complex and confusing mechanics’ lien law, MCLA 570.1; MSA 26.281. The question presented is whether the construction of a parking lot or parking area is a lienable item covered under the statute. The plaintiff, Hodgkiss & Douma, Inc., instituted this suit for foreclosure of a mechanics’ lien on a shopping center owned by the defendants. Plaintiff had constructed the parking area for the shopping center but apparently had no involvement with the Construction of any of its buildings. After commencement of the action, the defendants moved…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Freeform Pools, Inc. v. Strawbridge Home for Boys, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  2. People v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Reisterstown Lumber Co. v. ReederCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
  4. Bezold v. Beach Development Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Healy v. TolesMichigan Supreme Court · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Spartan Asphalt Paving Co. v. Grand Ledge Mobile Home ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Spartan Asphalt Paving Co. v. Grand Ledge Mobile Home ParkMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Spartan Asphalt Paving Co. v. Grand Ledge Mobile Home ParkMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Spartan Asphalt Paving Co. v. Grand Ledge Mobile Home ParkMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. William Moors, Inc. v. Pine Lake Shopping Center, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API