Legal Opinion

Thee v. Richardson

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 11, 1946No. Civ. No. 15163PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.

By his will the decedent herein left his entire estate, with the exception of an oil royalty, to three children, Alice Thee Richardson, contestant (hereinafter referred to as appellant), Earl J. Thee and Lloyd H. Thee, in equal shares. Lloyd H. Thee was appointed executor. Lloyd H. Thee and Earl J. Thee each filed a claim against the estate for personal services rendered during the lifetime of the decedent in the sum of $1,000. Another daughter, Huida Thee Wopschall, filed a claim for $500, likewise for personal services rendered during the lifetime of decedent. Said claims were allowed by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Collier v. LandramCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  2. Newbert v. McCarthyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Estate of SchellerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Morrison v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API