Legal Opinion
Morrison v. Murphy
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 18, 1951No. Civ. 14880PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.
The heirs of the decedent appeal from an order of the probate court allowing the claim of respondent as a creditor of the estate of Cole. The basis of the appeal is that the claim, as filed, does not comply with the provisions of section 705 of the Probate Code. We are of the opinion that the order appealed from is not an appealable order, and, for that reason, the appeal must be dismissed.
The respondent, Irene Murphy, filed a claim against the estate for $1,770, the claimed value of services alleged to have been rendered to decedent by the claimant at decedent’s request. The claim was first…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Estate of O'DeaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Miller v. California Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. SudenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Herrington v. HerringtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Estate of BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Palmer v. GreggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Estate of CuneoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Bank of America v. Department of Mental HygieneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Elftman v. MerrillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Gertner v. SUPERIOR COURT OF ORANGE CTY.California Court of Appeal · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.