Legal Opinion

San Francisco Baykeeper v. United States Fish And Wildlife Service

District Court, N.D. California

Decided August 5, 2021No. 3:21-cv-02566Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN FRANCISCO BAYKEEPER, 7 Case No. 21-cv-02566-JCS Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER DENYING MOTION TO 9 INTERVENE AND MOTION TO UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE DISMISS 10 SERVICE, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 13, 15 11 Defendants. 12 13 I. INTRODUCTION 14 Plaintiff San Francisco Baykeeper (“Baykeeper”) brings this action against the United 15 States Fish and Wildlife Service (“the Service”); Martha Williams, in her official capacity as 16 Principal Deputy Director of the Service; and Debra Haaland (“the Secretary”), in her official 17…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Bowen v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Smith v. MarshCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API