Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 5, 1984No. 32PA84PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COPELAND, Justice.

We believe that Judge Lewis correctly instructed the jury under the facts and circumstances of this case. The sole contention on appeal was that the trial judge incorrectly charged the jury regarding the State’s identification testimony and incorrectly refused to give instructions requested by the defendant.

Judge Lewis gave the following identification instructions:

In appraising the identification testimony of any witness, Members of the Jury, I suggest to you that you may consider the capacity and adequate opportunity the witness Houston had to observe the defendant.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. SilhanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Wall v. StoutSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  3. State v. MonkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  4. State v. GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Kinsey v. SpannCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  2. State v. GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  3. State v. MontgomerySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  4. State v. HantonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  5. Hanna v. BradyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API