Legal Opinion
United States v. James J. Armstrong, United States of America v. James L. Kuhn, United States of America v. James L. Kuhn
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided February 10, 1994No. 93-1483, 93-1485 and 93-1486PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HEANEY, Senior Circuit Judge.
James J. Armstrong and James L. Kuhn were convicted by a jury of uttering and conspiring to utter counterfeit obligations in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 472 and 371. Kuhn was also convicted of possessing counterfeit obligations with intent to defraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 472. Additionally, Kuhn was charged with possessing an unregistered firearm in violation of 26 U.S.C. §§ 5841, 5861(e), and 5871, to which he pleaded guilty after reserving the right to appeal the district court’s denial of his suppression motion. Armstrong was sentenced to eight months…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. Amador Rodriguez Chaidez, A/K/A Rodriguez Amador Chaidez and Amador RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- United States v. Paul William CunninghamCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Parker v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1998
- Rodis v. City & County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Preston E. MaxwellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Juan GomezCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.