Legal Opinion

Matter of Compensation of Davies

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 5, 1990No. 87-16765; CA A62692PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButtler, P. J.

Employer seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board affirming the referee’s decision that claimant’s back, neck and shoulder injuries are compensable. Claimant cross-petitions, contending that the Board’s award of attorney fees was inadequate. We affirm without discussion on the petition and reverse and remand on the cross-petition.

Claimant prevailed before the Board on employer’s appeal of the referee’s order setting aside employer’s denial of the claim. He was entitled to an award of employer-paid attorney fees under ORS 656.382(2). Claimant’s counsel submitted a statement…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Weyerhaeuser Co. v. FillmoreCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Leo Polehn Orchards v. HernandezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  2. Higgins v. Schramm PlasticsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. Paccar-Wagner Mining v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  4. Schoch v. LeupoldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API