Leo Polehn Orchards v. Hernandez
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.
At issue in this case is whether claimant’s injury arose out of and in the course of her employment. The Workers’ Compensation Board found that it did. Employer seeks review of that decision. We affirm.
Claimant and her husband are migrant farm workers who were hired to work for employer in one of its cherry orchards located near The Dalles. Employer offered its workers temporary housing at a migrant labor camp on the premises. Although employer did not contractually require all of its workers to live in the camp, the vast majority of them lived there, due to an absence of available housing in…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Rogers v. State Accident Insurance FundOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- Phil A. Livesley Co. v. RussOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- Clark v. U. S. PlywoodOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. ReelOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- Doe v. St. Michael's Med. Center, NewarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Pierre v. Seaside Farms, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
- O'Rourke v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- O'Rourke v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Enterprise Rent-A-Car Co. v. FrazerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- Roseburg Forest Products v. OwenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994