Legal Opinion

Higgins v. Schramm Plastics

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 22, 1992No. 90-02764, 89-18529; CA A70249Published

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Claimant seeks review of a Workers’ Compensation Board attorney fees award. We affirm.

Claimant filed a claim for work-related chronic toxic encephalopathy. Employer denied the claim, and claimant requested a hearing. Claimant prevailed before the referee on the issue of compensability, and the referee awarded her $14,450 in attorney fees. Employer requested Board review of the referee’s order. The Board affirmed the referee’s compensability determination but reduced the attorney fees award for services performed at the hearing level to $7,500. For prevailing on review, claimant requested…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Weyerhaeuser Co. v. FillmoreCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  2. Matter of Compensation of DaviesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API