State v. Acker
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
1Opinion of the Court
265 N.J. Super. 351 (1993)
627 A.2d 170
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
NORMAN ACKER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Submitted May 17, 1993.
Decided June 25, 1993.
Before Judges J.H. COLEMAN, SHEBELL and CONLEY.
William J. De Marco, attorney for appellant.
Robert J. Del Tufo, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney for respondent (Nancy A. Hulett, Deputy Attorney General, of counsel and on the brief).
2Per curiam
The key issue raised in this appeal is whether the prosecutor's summation was so egregious as to require a new trial. We hold that it was.
Defendant…
3Cases cited18 opinions
- State v. RamseurSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
- State v. KellySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- State v. MarshallSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
- State v. KoedatichSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by37 opinions
- State v. FrostSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
- State v. MortonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
- State v. ScherzerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
- State v. RoachSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.