Legal Opinion

State v. Acker

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided June 25, 1993PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

265 N.J. Super. 351 (1993)

627 A.2d 170

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

NORMAN ACKER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Submitted May 17, 1993.

Decided June 25, 1993.

Before Judges J.H. COLEMAN, SHEBELL and CONLEY.

William J. De Marco, attorney for appellant.

Robert J. Del Tufo, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney for respondent (Nancy A. Hulett, Deputy Attorney General, of counsel and on the brief).

2Per curiam

The key issue raised in this appeal is whether the prosecutor's summation was so egregious as to require a new trial. We hold that it was.

Defendant…

3Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. RamseurSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  2. State v. KellySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  3. State v. MarshallSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
  4. State v. KoedatichSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
  5. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by37 opinions

  1. State v. FrostSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
  2. State v. MortonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
  3. State v. SmithSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
  4. State v. ScherzerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
  5. State v. RoachSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API