Legal Opinion

People v. Campbell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 24, 1996PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*690We reject the defendant’s contention that his conviction should be reversed because the prosecutor made a reference to an uncharged crime in his opening statement. The prosecutor neither disclosed the nature of the uncharged crime nor revealed any of its underlying details. Moreover, in its charge to the jury, the court explained that the attorneys’ opening statements were not considered evidence upon which a determination could be based (see, People v Hopkins, 58 NY2d 1079, 1083). Although we agree with the defendant’s related argument that the trial court improperly admitted police…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. People v. SantiagoNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. People v. ArceNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. People v. HopkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. People v. WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. BarnesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. People v. McDonaldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. People v. McRaeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  4. People v. SantiagoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API