Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Hospira, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Gregory M. Sleet, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
I. INTRODUCTION
In this patent infringement action, plaintiff Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Cubist”) alleges that pharmaceutical products proposed by defendant Hospira, Inc. (“Hospi-ra”) infringe the asserted claims of the patents-in-suit. (D.I. 1.) The court held a five-day bench trial in this matter on February 18 through February 24, 2014. (D.I. 121-125.) Presently before the court are the parties’ post-trial proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law concerning the validity of the patents-in-suit and whether Hospira’s…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Bonito Boats, Inc. v. Thunder Craft Boats, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re Biogen 755 Patent Litig.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2018
- Pernix Ir. Pain Dac v. Alvogen Malta Operations Ltd.District Court, D. Delaware · 2018
- AstraZeneca LP v. Breath Ltd.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
- ASETEK Danmark A/S v. CMI USA, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Dentsply Sirona Inc. v. Edge Endo, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.