Legal Opinion
ASETEK Danmark A/S v. CMI USA, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided April 21, 2015No. Case No. 13-cv-00457-JSTPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW; ORDER ENTERING JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF
Re: ECF Nos. 234, 235, 236
JON S. TIGAR, United States District Judge
This patent infringement case was tried to a jury in December 2014. ECF No. 189. On December 17, 2014, the jury returned a verdict in favor of Plaintiff Ase-tek Danmark A/S, finding that Defendant CMI USA, Inc.’s products infringed United States Patents No. 8,245,764 and 8,240,-362 (“’764 patent” and “’362 patent”). ECF Nos. 218, 219.
Now before the Court are the parties’ proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law, as well as CMI’s…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Nautilus, Inc. v. Biosig Instruments, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Therasense, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson and Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Eli Lilly and Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re Biogen 755 Patent Litig.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2018
- Garcia v. Ramirez, Star 12District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021
- PureWick Corporation v. Sage Products, LLCDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2023