Legal Opinion

Randolph v. Ottenstein

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 8, 1965No. Civ. A. 1706-61PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLTZOFF, District Judge.

The principal question of law presented in this case is whether a person who claims to have sustained injuries caused by the negligence of another, and who-has obtained a settlement of his claim and. has given a general release, may thereafter repudiate the settlement, obtain a cancellation of the release and bring suit, on the original claim on the basis that he was unaware of one of the injuries resulting from the accident, and if so,, under what circumstances may this be-done. This question is of novel impression in the District of Columbia, and for this reason an…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Clancy v. PacentiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1957
  2. Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co. v. CurlCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
  3. Graham v. Atchison. T. & S. F. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
  4. Wheeler v. White Rock Bottling Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Thomas v. HollowellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1959

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Beaver v. Estate of HarrisWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Bolling Federal Credit Union v. Cumis Insurance Society, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Isaac v. First National Bank of MarylandDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Davis v. Flatiron Materials CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
  5. Inkel v. Pride Chevrolet-Pontiac, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API