Legal Opinion

Inkel v. Pride Chevrolet-Pontiac, Inc.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 18, 2008No. 2006-220PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurgess, J.

¶ 1. Plaintiffs Normand and Brandy Inkel appeal the superior court’s order granting defendant Pride Chevrolet 1 summary judgment and awarding the car dealership damages after rejecting the Inkels’ consumer-fraud claims concerning their purchase of a truck from the dealership. In addition to challenging the grant of summary judgment to Pride Chevrolet, the Inkels contend that they are entitled to summary judgment based on undisputed facts demonstrating that the dealership effectively raised the price of the truck by initially telling the Inkels that they would not have to pay for excess…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. White v. Quechee Lakes Landowners' Ass'nSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  2. Carter v. GugliuzziSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
  3. Jordan v. Nissan North America, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2004
  4. Winton v. Johnson & Dix Fuel Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1986
  5. Peabody v. P.J.'s Auto Village, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ianelli v. U.S. BankSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
  2. Grocery Manufacturers Ass'n v. SorrellDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2015
  3. Vermont College of Fine Arts v. City of MontpelierSupreme Court of Vermont · 2017
  4. Barefoot & Zweig Act 250 AppealVermont Superior Court · 2013
  5. Barefoot & Zweig Act 250 AppealVermont Superior Court · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API