Legal Opinion
Bolling Federal Credit Union v. Cumis Insurance Society, Inc.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided March 21, 1984No. 83-926PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRYOR, Associate Judge:
This case involves the proper construction of a release from liability. The trial court ruled upon cross-motions for summa-appellee’s favor, and dis-nt’s complaint with preju-m ry judgment missed appelk dice. We conclude that there was no genuine issue of ma court did not e appellee, pursu a matter of la\ Aerial fact, and that the trial err in awarding judgment to lant to Super. Ct.Civ.R. 56, as w. Hence, we affirm.
Appellant (Billing) is a credit union regulated by federa law, see 12 U.S.C. §§ 1751-95j (1982), which conducts business in the District of Columbia.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Johnson, Drake & Piper, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
- McCoy v. Quadrangle Development Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority to the Use and Benefit of Head Construction Company v. Mergentime Corporation, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Philip H. Garrett, United States of America v. Timothy M. McNamaraCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Marinopoliski v. IrishDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- 1010 Potomac Associates v. Grocery Manufacturers of America, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Hercules & Co. v. Shama Restaurant Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Dyer v. BilaalDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- Abdelrhman v. AckermanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- Tillery v. District of Columbia Contract Appeals BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.