Legal Opinion
Martinson v. Cagle
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided July 20, 1984No. 82-1260PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The Martinsons, plaintiffs, appeal from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict in this action to recover damages for personal injuries allegedly caused by the defendants. We affirm.
Mr. and Mrs. Martinson and their son were injured when their car was struck in the rear by a car owned by Mr. Cagle and operated by his 16-year-old son, Bradley Cagle. Brad's best friend, Mike Adams, aged 15 years, was a passenger in the Cagle car at the time of the accident.
The Martinsons' complaint contains, in Count One, allegations that Brad and Mike, as joint venturers, had negligently, wantonly, or willfully…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hardie-Tynes Mfg. Co. v. CruiseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
- Keller v. KiedingerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
- Dempsey v. DenmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- City of Birmingham v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
- Starnes v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Hipps v. Lauderdale County Bd. of Educ.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1993
- Smitherman v. McCaffertySupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
- Dennison v. KlotzConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
- Lollar v. PoeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
- Prill v. MarroneSupreme Court of Alabama · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.