Legal Opinion

Smitherman v. McCafferty

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 4, 1993No. 1920081PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This appeal presents an issue of first impression: Can an employee of a grocery store maintain a negligence action against a shoplifter for injuries allegedly sustained in a struggle to apprehend the fleeing shoplifter?

The trial court held that the shoplifter (defendant) did not owe a duty to the storekeeper (plaintiff) and entered a summary judgment for the defendant. We hold that the plaintiff has shown sufficient evidence to establish that the defendant had a duty not to flee, and that there is a triable issue of fact as to whether the defendant negligently caused the plaintiff's alleged…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. PaulCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  2. Hardie-Tynes Mfg. Co. v. CruiseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  3. Pugh v. Butler Telephone Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  4. Southeastern Greyhound Lines v. CallahanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  5. Keebler v. Winfield Carraway Hosp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Armstrong Business Services, Inc. v. AmSouth BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  2. Pritchett v. ICN Medical Alliance, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  3. Southland Bank v. a & a Drywall Supply Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2009
  4. Patrick v. Union State BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  5. DiBiasi v. Joe Wheeler Elec. Membership Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2008

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API