Smitherman v. McCafferty
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
This appeal presents an issue of first impression: Can an employee of a grocery store maintain a negligence action against a shoplifter for injuries allegedly sustained in a struggle to apprehend the fleeing shoplifter?
The trial court held that the shoplifter (defendant) did not owe a duty to the storekeeper (plaintiff) and entered a summary judgment for the defendant. We hold that the plaintiff has shown sufficient evidence to establish that the defendant had a duty not to flee, and that there is a triable issue of fact as to whether the defendant negligently caused the plaintiff's alleged…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. PaulCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
- Hardie-Tynes Mfg. Co. v. CruiseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
- Pugh v. Butler Telephone Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987
- Southeastern Greyhound Lines v. CallahanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
- Keebler v. Winfield Carraway Hosp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Armstrong Business Services, Inc. v. AmSouth BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
- Pritchett v. ICN Medical Alliance, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2006
- Southland Bank v. a & a Drywall Supply Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2009
- Patrick v. Union State BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
- DiBiasi v. Joe Wheeler Elec. Membership Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2008
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.