City of Birmingham v. Thompson
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
The question is whether, under the following facts, the City of Birmingham (Birmingham) is liable for a tort allegedly committed by one of its employees. We hold that Code 1975, §11-47-190,* the statute governing municipal tort liability, permits plaintiff Thompson's cause of action, and we affirm the judgment in his favor
Plaintiff was incarcerated in the Birmingham City Jail on the charge of destroying private property. While plaintiff was in jail, he was allegedly beaten by police officers for refusing to change into a prison uniform. Plaintiff brought suit against Birmingham, alleging that…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Alteiri v. ColassoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Chapman v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
- McGee v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1912
- B'ham Ry. L. & P. Co. v. ColemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
- Thomason v. GraySupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Franklin v. City of HuntsvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
- Rich v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
- Susan Ryan v. napier/kleinArizona Supreme Court · 2018
- Hardy v. Town of HaynevilleDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1999
- Williams v. City of TuscumbiaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.