Legal Opinion

Sullivan v. Ross

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided March 27, 2002PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a Dist/Mun. Cts. RADA, Rule 8C, appeal by the defendant-landlords of a judgment entered for the plaintiff-tenant in a slip and fall case tried before a judge without a jury.

1. None of the requested rulings of law filed by the landlords, of which five were denied, form the basis of this appeal. Instead, the landlords argue that the evidence presented at trial “cannot sustain [the] judgment” and that, in any event, the damages awarded were excessive. Although not required to do so, the trial judge elected to make written findings of fact and rulings of law. We will set aside those…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Harlow v. ChinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  2. Aylward v. McCloskeyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  3. Macone Bros. v. StraussMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1997
  4. Mitchell v. Hastings & Koch Enterprises, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1995
  5. Barry v. Beverly Enterprises-Massachusetts, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. North Shore Chiropractic v. Norfolk & Dedham GroupMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2010
  2. Berkshire-Westwood Graphics Group, Inc. v. DavidsonMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2007
  3. Bairos Construction, Inc. v. AnjosMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2015
  4. Sanieoff v. CurtisMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API