United States v. General Battery Corporation, Inc., Exide Corporation Exide Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SCIRICA, Chief Judge.
This appeal addresses successor liability under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq., for environmental response costs incurred by the United States at a lead-contaminated Superfund site. The District Court granted summary judgment in favor of the United States on a “de facto merger” theory of successor liability. We will affirm.
I
The matter begins with a now defunct company, Price Battery Corporation. From the 1930s through 1966, Price Battery manufactured lead acid batteries at a plant in…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. HolyfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Berg Chilling Systems, Inc. v. Hull Corporation Sp Industries, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- Marsh v. RosenbloomCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- K.C.1986 Ltd. Partnership v. Reade ManufacturingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Recurrent Capital Bridge Fund I, LLC v. ISR Systems & Sensors Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.