United States v. E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SCIRICA, Chief Judge.
At issue is whether the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq., authorizes the United States to recover costs incurred in the course of supervising a hazardous waste cleanup conducted by responsible private parties. We hold CERCLA provides for such recovery. Accordingly, we will overrule United States v. Rohm & Haas Co., 2 F.3d 1265 (3d Cir.1993), and reverse the order of the District Court.
I
The material facts are undisputed. The DuPont Newport Superfund Site is an industrial site…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Joseph Pakootas v. Teck Cominco Metals, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Trinity Industries, Inc. v. Chicago Bridge & Iron Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- Ashley II of Charleston LLC v. PCS Nitrogen IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- Sullivan v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2008
- Trinity Industries Inc v. Greenlease Holding CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.