Legal Opinion
Long v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 31, 2009No. Civil Action 08-849 (PLF)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM■ OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs brought this suit for damages resulting from allegedly illegal tax liens placed on their house. Defendants counterclaimed to reduce the liens to judgment. The action is presently before the Court on defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and plaintiffs’ motion to dismiss the counterclaim. Upon careful consideration of the parties’ papers and the entire record in the case, the Court grants defendants’ motion to dismiss, and denies plaintiffs’ motion to dismiss. 1
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kim v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Keohane v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Gust v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Lucas, Jr. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Gust v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.