United States v. Giramonti
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
TIMBERS, District Judge.
Defendant moves, pursuant to Rule 7 (f), Fed.R.Crim.P., 18 U.S.C., for a bill of particulars with respect to the indictment and, pursuant to Rule 16, Fed.R. Crim.P., for inspection of a document referred to in the indictment.
*169The indictment, in one count, charges defendant, Helen Asvestas Giramonti, with having uttered and passed a forged Post Office Money Order, knowing a material signature or indorsement to be false, with intent to defraud the United States or one Joseph J. Pacyna, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 500. The indictment specifies that the alleged offense…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wong Tai v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- United States v. DolanDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1953
- United States v. SchneidermanDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1952
- United States v. Marty RussoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
- United States v. PignoneDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1960
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. TannerDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1967
- State v. HicksTennessee Supreme Court · 1984
- United States v. ManettiDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1971
- United States v. PalmisanoDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1967
- United States v. AranciDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1961