United States v. Schneiderman
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
MATHES, District Judge.
Defendants, fifteen in number, stand', charged with conspiracy to commit offenses, against the United States, 18 U.S.C. § 371 prohibited by the Smith- Act, 54 Stat. 670,, Act June 28, 1940, 18 U.S.C. (1946 ed.) §'• 10, • 18- U.S.C. (1948 ed.) § 2385, “by * * * advocating and teaching the duty and necessity of overthrowing the Government of the United States by force and ■violence * *
'Ip preparing their defense to that .indictment' defendants have caused the Clerk to-issue a subpoena duces ’tecum pursuant to- Rule 17(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, 18…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Langnes v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Goldman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States Ex Rel. Touhy v. RagenSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Scher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- United States v. IoziaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1952
- United States v. PeltzDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955
- Fryer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
- United States v. BrennanDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1955
- United States v. Certain Parcels of LandDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1953
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.