Legal Opinion
Ortega Melendres v. Arpaio
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided February 10, 2009No. CV-07-2513-PHX-MHMPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MARY H. MURGUIA, District Judge.
Currently pending before the Court are Defendants Joseph M. Arpaio, Maricopa County, and the Maricopa County Sheriffs Office’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #39.), and Plaintiffs Manuel de Jesus Ortega Melendres, Jessica Quitugua Rodriguez, David Rodriguez, Velia Meraz, Manuel Nieto, Jr., and Somos America’s Motion for an Expedited Rule 16 Conference. (Dkt. # 49.) After reviewing the record and holding oral argument, the Court issues the following Order.
I. Standard
A Rule 12(b)(6) motion tests the legal sufficiency of the claims asserted in the complaint. A Rule…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Braillard v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- Puente Arizona v. ArpaioDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2015
- United States v. Maricopa CountyDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2012
- United States v. MaricopaDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2015
- Braillard v. Maricopa County, Maricopa County Sheriff's OfficeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.