Legal Opinion

Puente Arizona v. Arpaio

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided January 5, 2015No. CV-14-01356-PHX-DGCPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

DAVID G. CAMPBELL, District Judge.

This case involves the constitutionality of two statutes that criminalize the act of identity theft done with the intent to obtain or continue employment. Plaintiffs claim that the purpose of these statutes is to discriminate against unauthorized aliens and that this purpose makes the statutes unconstitutional under the Supremacy and Equal Protection Clauses of the United States Constitution. Plaintiffs have moved for a preliminary injunction that would enjoin Defendants from enforcing portions of these statutes. Doc. 30. Defendants have responded and…

2Cases cited132 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  5. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

127 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. Martha Aracely MartinezSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
  2. United States v. MaricopaDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2015
  3. Amended August 15, 2017 State of Iowa v. Martha Aracely MartinezSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
  4. Amended June 16, 2017 State of Iowa v. Martha Aracely MartinezSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
  5. Idaho Organization of Resource Councils v. LabradorDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2025

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API