Legal Opinion

People v. Wachowicz

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 1, 1968PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBergan, J.

The circumstantial evidence in this record, seen in full perspective, forms a reliable basis upon which the jury could make a finding that defendant-appellant Wachowicz, acting with Jack Morris, attempted to break into a building in the early hours of the morning and for this purpose they used together a pinch bar, a workable burglar’s tool found in possession of Morris.

Proof of the crime itself, the attempt to commit burglary, is clear and unmistakable. The physical evidence points to such a crime. It is an accepted rule that the corpus delicti may be established by circumstantial evidence…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. The People v. . BennettNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. People v. . HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  3. People v. . RazeziczNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  4. Commonwealth v. HarmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1846
  5. People v. WolteringNew York Court of Appeals · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. People v. JenningsNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. People v. KennedyNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. People v. PenaNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. People v. WayNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. People v. LipskyNew York Court of Appeals · 1982

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API