People v. Wachowicz
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBergan, J.
The circumstantial evidence in this record, seen in full perspective, forms a reliable basis upon which the jury could make a finding that defendant-appellant Wachowicz, acting with Jack Morris, attempted to break into a building in the early hours of the morning and for this purpose they used together a pinch bar, a workable burglar’s tool found in possession of Morris.
Proof of the crime itself, the attempt to commit burglary, is clear and unmistakable. The physical evidence points to such a crime. It is an accepted rule that the corpus delicti may be established by circumstantial evidence…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- The People v. . BennettNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- People v. . HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- People v. . RazeziczNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Commonwealth v. HarmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1846
- People v. WolteringNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- People v. JenningsNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. KennedyNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- People v. PenaNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. WayNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. LipskyNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.