Legal Opinion

Cato v. Williamson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 19, 1923No. 4 Div. 53PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

Plaintiff in the court below brought suit to recover a sum claimed as balance due for cutting cross-ties under a special contract. Defendant pleaded the general issue, *and in short by consent, with leave to give in evidence any matter which may be specially pleaded; and the plaintiff had like leave to reply. Under such pleading and the evidence, the defense was that of the general issue and set-off and recoupment.

The defendant contends that plaintiff guaranteed the ties “to pass on inspection.” The position of the plaintiff is there was no such agreement; that the contract was that the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. J. C. Lysle Milling Co. v. North Alabama Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  2. Culver v. HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  3. Dickerson v. FinleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  4. Burnett Bean v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  5. Birmingham Water Works Co. v. FergusonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Aiken v. McMillanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  2. Oden-Elliott Lumber Co. v. Daniel-Gaddis Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  3. Southern Metal Treating Co. v. GoodnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
  4. Cortner v. Anderson, Clayton & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  5. McCord v. BridgesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API