Legal Opinion

Ronald Banks v. Gerald Rozum

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 17, 2016No. 15-2121UnpublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION *

2Per curiam

Ronald Banks, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, appeals from the District . Court’s order dismissing his complaint for the failure to state a claim. Because the appeal presents no substantial question, we will summarily affirm. See 3d Cir. L.A.R. 27.4; I.O.P. 10.6.

I

As we write primarily for the parties, who are familiar with this case, the following summary suffices. Banks’ prolix and repetitive complaint contains 397 paragraphs and 139 exhibits, which Banks incorporated into the complaint.- The complaint alleged that the defendant employees at SCI-Somerset, where Banks was…

3Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by18 opinions

  1. Baar v. Jaguar Land Rover N. Am., LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2018
  2. BACON v. ORTIZDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021
  3. DETTY v. BECKDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
  4. Fisher v. MurryDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2022
  5. HARRISON v. HARRISONDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API