Berg v. Carey
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMccarthy, C. J.
The first cause of action in the amended complaint sets forth a promissory note for $718 from defendant Clem Carey to respondent, secured by chattel mortgage duly recorded in Kootenai county, Idaho. It further alleges that the principal sum of the note is due and unpaid. For a second cause of action respondent alleges that the Commissioner of Commerce and Industry, as receiver of the Union State Bank, and appellants Booth and Osterhout wrongfully removed certain of the chattels covered by the mortgage from Kootenai county, and from the possession of the mortgagor Carey, that the value of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Smith v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Rein v. CallawayIdaho Supreme Court · 1901
- State v. JonesIdaho Supreme Court · 1921
- Ashurst v. GibsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
- Noble v. HarrisIdaho Supreme Court · 1920
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Mauldin v. Sunshine Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1939
- State Ex Rel. Taylor v. TaylorIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
- Forbush v. San Diego Fruit & Produce Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1928
- Garrett v. SoucieIdaho Supreme Court · 1928
- Rowe v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1932
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.