Legal Opinion

Rowe v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1932No. 5915PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEE, C. J. —

Suit for damages due to collision with standing box-car. Defendant and appellant, Northern Pacific Railway Company, has long maintained a grade crossing over Main Street in the city of Moscow. From the south, it is approached by a standard, twenty foot, gravel highway, the last .sixty-five feet thereof consisting of a plank bridge maintained by the city, with the exception of that portion over which appellant’s trains operate. In January, 1931, the city installed a modern incandescent light 73.2 feet south of the crossing. About the year 1916, a similar light had been installed by…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lauson v. Town of Fond du LacWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  2. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. GuthrieSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  3. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. GillespieIndiana Court of Appeals · 1930
  4. Gallagher v. Montpelier & Wells River RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1927
  5. Hendley v. Chicago & Nortwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1929

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Ineas v. Union Pac. R. Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Smith v. SharpIdaho Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Southern Ry. Co. v. LambertSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  4. Mauldin v. Sunshine Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Fitzpatrick v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1941

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API