Legal Opinion

State v. Sweet

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 13, 1929No. 27,613PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

Defendant appeals from the order denying a new trial after a conviction under an information charging him with abandonment of and failure to care for his minor child under G. S. 1923 (2 Mason, 1927) § 10135.

The facts necessary to state are these: The complaining witness and defendant were married in June, 1923. A daughter was born to them in May, 1924. In March, 1925, the wife obtained a divorce from defendant, and by the decree the care and custody of the child was awarded to its mother, but defendant was ordered to pay $50 per month for the child’s support. In May, 1925, defendant was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jacobs v. JacobsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  2. State v. ClarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  3. People v. DunstonMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  4. State v. WoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  5. Jackson v. JacksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. WorthingtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  2. State v. TownsendSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  3. Halpaine v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2011
  4. State v. EhmkeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
  5. State v. WashneskySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API