Legal Opinion

Blatz Brewing Co. v. Collins

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 12, 1948No. Civ. 13658PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.

Appeal from a judgment on the pleadings in favor of plaintiffs.

This action was brought for an injunction and declaratory relief to obtain an adjudication that rule 55 of the State Board of Equalization, pertaining to out-of-state manufacturers of beer who ship' their product into the state, is void. (This rule is now known as No. 128, California Administrative Code, ch. 1, tit. 4, and will be generally referred to herein as rule 128.)

In 1944, the trial court sustained without leave to amend the demurrer of defendants to the complaint. From the judgment thereon, plaintiffs appealed to this…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. State Bd. of Equalization of Cal. v. Young's Market Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Whitcomb Hotel, Inc. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Hodges v. SnyderSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Tulare Irrigation District v. Lindsay-Strathmore Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Laisne v. California State Board of OptometryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bigbee v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1983
  2. California Coastal Commission v. Quanta Investment Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1980
  3. Yeoman v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. Pumice Products, Inc. v. RobisonIdaho Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Bigbee v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API