Legal Opinion

Levin v. Florsheim & Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 1903No. 20,077PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From Vigo Circuit Court; J. F. Piety, Judge. Action by Florsheim & Company against Barnard Levin and others. From an interlocutory order appointing a receiver, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtJordan, J.

— This is an appeal by the appellants from an interlocutory order of the lower court appointing a receiver pendente lite. The principal action was instituted on January 5, 1903, by the plaintiff Elorsheim & Co., a corporation duly organized under the laws of the state of Illinois. Appellants Barnard, Henry, and Max Levin, partners, doing business under the firm name of B. & H. Levin Brothers, together with Peter J. Kaufman, Rachel Goldenberg and Aaron Goldenberg, her husband, were made defendants in the action.

The complaint is in three paragraphs. The third was filed during the hearing of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mead v. BurkIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Supreme Sitting of the Order of the Iron Hall v. BakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Chicago & Southeastern Railway Co. v. KenneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Sheridan Brick Works v. Marion Trust Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Goshen Woolen Mills Co. v. City National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kist v. Coughlin, Tr.Indiana Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Wehmeier v. Mercantile Banking Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  3. Kent Avenue Grocery Co. v. George Hitz & Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Sallee v. SoulesIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Strebel v. BlighIndiana Supreme Court · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API