Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Bell v. Strange

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 27, 2013No. 1120603Published

1ConcurrenceShaw, Justice

In the trial court, the pro se plaintiff, Sandra Bell, attacked two acts of the legislature, Act No. 2012-275 and Act No. 2012-276, Ala. Acts 2012, which allowed for a vote of the electorate on what were styled as two constitutional “amendments” altering Article XII and Article XIII of the Alabama Constitution of 1901. Although the legislature may adopt an act submitting to the electorate an amendment to the constitution, see Ala. Const.1901, Art. XVIII, § 284, it may not adopt an act submitting to the electorate a new constitution, because that must be done by a constitutional convention,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Tucker v. NicholsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  2. Gunter v. BeasleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  3. Fogarty v. SouthworthSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  4. Laidlaw Transit, Inc. v. Alabama Educ. Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  5. Brown v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API