Legal Opinion

Brown v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided November 1, 2002No. 2000925PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In this case, an employee challenges the validity of a "utilization review" conducted on behalf of her employer under our Workers' Compensation Act, Ala. Code 1975, § 25-5-1 et seq. ("the Act"). The trial court rejected that challenge. We affirm.

The record reveals the following: On November 7, 1992, Vivian Lucille Brown suffered an injury to her left arm and left shoulder while working for her employer, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. In May 1994, Brown filed an action seeking workers' compensation benefits from Wal-Mart. In January 1996, the parties entered into a settlement agreement relating to…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. Equifax Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  2. Miller v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Boshell v. KeithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  4. Ex Parte Southeast Alabama Medical CenterCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2002
  5. State v. Maddox Tractor & Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1953

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Avis Rent a Car Systems, Inc. v. HeilmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  2. Lloyd Noland Hosp. v. DurhamSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  3. Waters Bros. Contractors, Inc. v. WimberleyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2009
  4. Ex parte C.L.J.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2006
  5. Yellow Dog Development, LLC v. Bibb CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API