Legal Opinion
United States for an Order Authorizing the Roving Interception of Oral Communications v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 18, 2003No. 02-15635PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge BERZON. Dissent by Judge TALLMAN.
OPINION
BERZON, Circuit Judge:
Giving new meaning to the automotive advertising slogans “The Ultimate Driving Machine”1 and “We’ve Got You Covered,” 2 some luxury cars are now equipped with telecommunication devices that provide a set of innovative services to car owners. These on-board systems assist drivers in activities from the mundane — such as navigating an unfamiliar neighborhood or finding a nearby Chinese restaurant — to the more vital — such as responding to emergencies or obtaining road-side assistance. Such systems operate via a…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- United States v. New York Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Estate of Cowart v. Nicklos Drilling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Dalia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Sullivan v. StroopSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States for an Order Authorizing the Roving Interception of Oral Communications v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003