Legal Opinion
State of Minn., City of Burnsville v. Juarez
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 21, 1984No. C7-83-1421PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOZNIAK, Judge.
This is an appeal from a pretrial order of the Dakota County Court suppressing the results of a breathalyzer test in a prosecution for driving while intoxicated (DWI) under Minn.Stat. § 169.121 (1982). The court held that collateral estoppel applied where the test results were suppressed in a prior ruling pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 169.-123 (1982), the Implied Consent law. We reverse.
FACTS
Eugene Juarez was charged in Burns-ville, Dakota County, on May 15, 1983 with driving while under the influence of alcohol, Minn.Stat. § 169.121 (1982), and driving with an alcohol…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Willems v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Margo-Kraft Distributors, Inc. v. Minneapolis Gas Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- State, Department of Public Safety v. MulvihillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- State, Department of Public Safety v. HouseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
3Cited by7 opinions
- Iowa Department of Transportation v. Iowa District CourtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
- State v. VictorsenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Virsen v. Rosso, Beutel, Johnson, Rosso & EbersoldCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Kirsch v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- State v. LemmerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.