Legal Opinion
O'Hara v. Gannon
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 8, 1951PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.
The defendants, Dix, Weiss and Duratile Of The East, Inc., have moved to sever each of three causes of action alleged in the complaint on the ground of a misjoinder of the parties and the causes of action.
Analysis of the complaint shows that the first cause of action seeks the specific performance of an alleged option agreement between the defendants Gannon and McMackins on the one hand and the plaintiff, Patrick F. O’Hara, and the defendant, Monroe L. Dix, on the other hand and to require the former to *930surrender up and deliver, properly indorsed for transfer to the latter, certain shares of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Great Northern Telegraph Co. v. Yokohama Specie Bank, Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1947
- Federal Housing Administrator v. ChristiansonDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1939
- Kelso v. CavanaghNew York Supreme Court · 1930
- Hahn v. FuerthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
- Man-Sew Pinking Attachment Corp. v. Chandler Mach. Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1939
3Cited by1 opinion
- Cipolla v. La FrancoNew York Supreme Court · 1960