Legal Opinion
United States Steel Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided July 20, 2009No. Consol. 07-00170PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BARZILAY, Judge.
In December 2006, the U.S. Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) determined that it would apply a new methodology to calculate the weighted-average dumping margins in certain investigations. See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin During an Antidumping Investigation; Final Modification, 71 Fed.Reg. 77,722, 77,722 (Dep’t Commerce Dec. 27, 2006) (“Section 123 Determination ”). 1 Plaintiff United States Steel Corporation (“U.S.Steel”), along with other interested domestic parties, 2 challenge that determination in a particular Section…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Crosby v. National Foreign Trade CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Helvering v. Stockholms Enskilda BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- United States Steel Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Trust Chem Co. Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2011
- GPX International Tire Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2010
- Dillinger France S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
- Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2010
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.