Peterson v. Omaha & Council Bluffs Street Railway Co.
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGoss, C. J.
Plaintiff appeals because, after her evidence was submitted to the jury, the court sustained defendants’ motion to discharge the jury, dismissed the action, and entered judgment for defendants for costs. Error is assigned on sustaining the motion and on the holding that there was no evidence to show defendants guilty of negligence.
This case was before the court in 1936 to review a former trial in which there had been a judgment for plaintiff. The judgment was reversed. Peterson v. Omaha & *323C. B. Street R. Co., 131 Neb. 676, 269 N. W. 510. The facts as they there appeared were very concisely…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Peterson v. Omaha & Council Bluffs Street Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1936
- Adams v. New York City Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
3Cited by14 opinions
- Momsen v. Nebraska Methodist HospitalNebraska Supreme Court · 1981
- Gohlinghorst v. RuessNebraska Supreme Court · 1945
- Kipf v. BitnerNebraska Supreme Court · 1948
- Kirchner v. GastNebraska Supreme Court · 1959
- Angstadt Ex Rel. Angstadt v. ColemanNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.